Anti-Discrimination Law in the UK Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Anti-Discrimination Law in the UK - Essay ExampleWhat has the provisions of this wreak imply to organizations? In the performance of its functions, a firm must suffer special cognizance to lead aspects covered by or under the Act (Rivers, 2012) 1. Avoid and eliminate any conduct that has the yield of constituting harassment, victimization, discrimination or any other prohibited conduct 2. Culture equation for every persons who portion the protected feature articles and those who do not with regard to opportunities 3. Encourage proper relations amongst individuals with the relevant protected characteristics and as well those who do not instalment 71 of the Act regards discrimination against sex in relation to pay. Section 77 refers to discrimination through the discussions over terms of pay. Section 78 provides regulations on gender pay gap (www.legislation.gov.uk, 2010).These sections have gone some way to strengthening the statutory enforcement of equal pay amid men and wome n within public entities. However, governments failure to enact one of these three detailed provisions may ultimately hamper the effectiveness of the Act. In analysing the aforementioned sectional provisions and assessing their possible impact in combatting discrimination with regard to employment, it is imperative to understand first what variables are prevalent in laws on societal equality (Rivers, 2012).The mystery that is equality rests within the (misconception in) Western political tradition that views equality as a fundamental and universal moral characteristic of human beings of equal self-regard and charge (Dworkin, 2002). It stretches beyond the Aristotelian definition of a purely formal existence, which postulates that likes be treated similarly, and differences proportionately. Most significantly is the acknowledgement of the uniqueness of human beings. Therefore, equality would intimate that people be valued both in their uniqueness and similarities. Firstly, we addr ess the object variable which answers the question, what exactly is subject to the equality principle? This is easily soluble at a highly abstract level. All humans being equal in rights and dignity deserve equal respect and concern. However, in practice this presents a fairly complex ideal lotion not only civil and political rights but a myriad of welfare, opportunity and resources. John Rawls place within his justice theory two principles of equality in which the justification of differences was only valid should they take in the least well-off and related to positions held under fair opportunities. These were equality of liberty and that of fundamental (basic) social goods. Secondly, the characteristic variable, which defines who the recipient(s) of the principle are and why they merit such special treatment. Article 14 of the European form of Human rights states that all rights should be enjoyed by all regardless of distinction. Initially and subsequent to this proclamation , there was oft resistance towards identifying specific benchmarks that merit special attention. Presently, practical concerns aimed at addressing ingrained bias and social excommunication have developed into a rallying cry for equality as a human right-born start of Civil Rights movements (Rivers, 2012).